The Design Inference is scheduled to be published
with Cambridge University Press early August of 1998. It is appearing
in the series Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction,
and Decision Theory. The inside dustjacket reads as follows:
How can we identify events due to intelligent causes and distinguish them from events due to undirected natural causes? If we lack a causal theory, how can we determine whether an intelligent cause acted? This book presents a reliable method for detecting intelligent causes: the design inference.The design inference uncovers intelligent causes by isolating the key trademark of intelligent causes: specified events of small probability. Just about anything that happens is highly improbable, but when a highly improbable event is also specified (i.e., conforms to an independently given pattern) undirected natural causes lose their explanatory power. Design inferences can be found in a range of scientific pursuits from forensic science to research into the origins of life to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.
This challenging and provocative book shows how incomplete undirected causes are for science and breathes new life into classical design arguments. It will be read with particular interest by philosophers of science and religion, other philosophers concerned with epistemology and logic, probability and complexity theorists, and statisticians.
"As the century and with it the millennium come to an end, questions long buried have disinterred themselves and come clattering back to intellectual life, dragging their winding sheets behind them. Just what, for example, is the origin of biological complexity and how is it to be explained? We have no more idea today than Darwin did in 1859, which is to say no idea whatsoever. William Dembski's book is not apt to be the last word on the inference to design, but it will surely be the first. It is a fine contribution to analysis, clear, sober, informed, mathematically sophisticated and modest. Those who agree with its point of view will read it with pleasure, and those who do not, will ignore it at their peril."
David Berlinski, mathematician,
author of The Tour of the Calculus
The following two endorsements will appear on the back cover:
Dembski has written a sparklingly original book. Not since David Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion has someone taken such a close look at the design argument, but it is done now in a much broader post-Darwinian context. Now we proceed with modern characterizations of probability and complexity, and the results bear fundamentally on notions of randomness and on strategies for dealing with the explanation of radically improbable events. We almost forget that design arguments are implicit in criminal arguments "beyond a reasonable doubt," plagiarism, phylogenetic inference, cryptography, and a host of other modern contexts. Dembski's analysis of randomness is the most sophisticated to be found in the literature, and his discussions are an important contribution to the theory of explanation, and a timely discussion of a neglected and unanticipatedly important topic.William Wimsatt, philosopher of biology, University of Chicago
In my view, Dembski has given us a brilliant study of the precise connections linking chance, probability, and design. A lucidly written work of striking insight and originality, The Design Inference provides significant progress concerning notoriously difficult questions. I expect this to be one of those rare books that genuinely transforms its subject.
Jon P. Jarrett, philosopher of physics,
University of Illinois at Chicago
Detecting design and distinguishing it from natural causation is one of the things science frequently does, but understanding of this subject has been impeded by ideological prejudice. William Dembski's superb analysis brings design theory into mainstream science. I predict that it will have an enormous influence over the science and philosophy of the 21st century.
Dembski is one of the most important of the "design" theorists who are sparking a scientific revolution by legitimating the concept of intelligent design in science. At some point not far in the future, scientists will be saying "of course biological organisms are intelligently designed," and "of course neo-Darwinism was never more than a pseudoscientific philosophical ideology like Freudianism and Marxism." When that happens, William Dembski will deserve a lot of the credit.
Phillip E. Johnson,
professor of law,
University of California at Berkeley,
author of Darwin on Trial
Michael Behe,
professor of biochemistry, Lehigh University,
author of Darwin's Black Box
Robert Kaita,
Principal Research Physicist,
Plasma Physics Laboratory,
Princeton University
Jonathan Wells, Ph.D. (theol.),
Ph.D. (biol.),
Department of Molecular & Cell Biology,
University of California at Berkeley
Walter Bradley,
professor of mechanical engineering,
Texas A&M,
co-author of
The Mystery of Life's Origin
Robert C. Newman, Ph.D. (astrophysics)
Director, Interdisciplinary Biblical Research Institute
William Lane Craig, Ph.D. (theol.),
Ph.D. (phil.),
lecturer, apologist, author of numerous books,
co-author of Theism, Atheism and Big Bang Cosmology (Oxford)
John Angus Campbell,
professor of communications, University of Memphis;
President, American Association for the
Rhetoric of
Science & Technology
John Mark Reynolds,
professor of philosophy, Biola University;
Director, Torrey Honors Institute
John Lennox,
professor of mathematics,
University of Wales
Robert Koons,
professor of philosophy,
University of Texas at Austin
Cambridge Studies in Probability, Induction and Decision Theory
Cambridge University Press
260 pages, hardback, 0-521-62387-1, $54.95 (available August 1998)
ORDER DIRECTLY FROM CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS:
1-800-872-7423
OR FROM AMAZON BOOKS (www.amazon.com).