|
|
  
Probe Ministries
Defending the Faith
Christian Apologetics in a Non-Christian World
The 1995 Evangelical Theological Society Annual
Meeting
Defending the Faith Philosophically
Dr. J. P. Moreland, Talbot Seminary
Summarized by Rich Milne
What do theologians talk about when they get together? Not always
theology. At the recent annual meeting of the Evangelical
Theological Society, the opening address by Dr. J. P. Moreland was
about the need for believers to understand philosophy in order to
advance the kingdom of God.
For many of us, our contact with philosophy probably comes from
Colossians 2:8 which says "See that no one take you captive through
philosophy and empty deception." So why would any Christian want to
have anything to do with philosophy?
Many Christians today feel that they and the church have been
pushed to the edge of the cultural discussion: they feel
marginalized. How did Christians in the past earn the right to be
taken seriously in their culture? What did they do in the "good old
days"?
Dr. Moreland spoke of John Wesley's requirements for a minister of
the gospel. What was first on his list? A capacity for sound
reasoning. And what should he study? "Logic, metaphysic, natural
theology, and geometry!" Most seminary students today don't even
take one course in philosophy, and yet we expect them to understand
the times and know how to answer the philosophical skeptics who
love to ridicule Christianity.
What did the great Church Father Augustine say in the fifth
century? "We must show our scriptures not to be in conflict with
whatever our critics can demonstrate about the nature of things
from reliable sources." Philosophy was the main tool Augustine used
in this task.
Philip Johnson, a distinguished law professor at the University of
California-Berkeley, speaks and writes pointedly about the
weaknesses of what he calls philosophical naturalism. This is the
philosophy that undergirds not only evolution, but also much of the
way our culture looks at all of life. It proclaims that science
gives the only facts we can know are true, and if science cannot
study something, then it isn't important. This is a deeply held
philosophical position, and Dr. Johnson's arguments have been
philosophical ones, but he has made them understandable to most of
us. He has been an excellent example of using philosophy to show
the weaknesses of a world view that attacks Christianity.
What can the church be doing to carry forward the task of "letting
philosophy provide structure and sharpness to our discourse in the
public square"? We need to integrate philosophy into the everyday
work of the church. We can encourage our seminaries to hire at
least one philosophy professor. We can make classes and institutes
a part of the church's teaching ministry and attend them. We can
set aside funds for students who want to study philosophy. We can
bring Christian philosophers into the network of the church to both
teach us and be a part of the body of Christ.
"As the history of the church has shown us, the broader development
of the life of the mind is important for advancing the kingdom of
God, and learning philosophy is crucial for developing a broader
life of the mind."
So, perhaps each of us needs to think a little more and encourage
those who lead us to teach us how to think carefully, logically,
and clearly so that we can have accurate, well-thought-out answers
when people challenge our Christian faith. As Peter says, God
expects us to "Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who
asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have" (1 Peter
3:15). Are you prepared?
Defending the Faith Historically
Dr. Gary Habermas, Liberty University
Summarized by Don Closson
Christianity is uniquely tied to history. At its very core it
depends on historical events as a test for the validity of what God
has done on our behalf. As Paul argues in 1 Corinthians 15, if
Christ has not been raised from the dead, our faith is futile and
we are still in our sins. Thus, the historical reality of the
resurrection of Christ can be seen as a foundation upon which all
believers can build their life in Christ.
What if, as some recent historians have argued, we can have no
objective knowledge about history, that we can never really know
what happened in the past? Most historians now recognize that
personal preferences, group affiliations, different systems of
historical interpretation, and different world views create a
barrier between the historian and what really has occurred. But is
the barrier total and unscalable?
Dr. Gary Habermas, professor of philosophy and theology at Liberty
University, recently addressed the topic of apologetics and history
at the Evangelical Theological Society's annual conference in
Philadelphia. His address noted some of the strengths and
weaknesses of evangelical scholars in their use of and
contributions to the study of history. However, what might be the
most important issue dealt with was this growing assertion in
Western academia that knowledge of the past cannot be known
objectively. If this position is accepted as valid, then we can
never know that Jesus Christ even walked the earth other than in a
personal subjective way through the eyes of faith. One way some
historians state this view is that history is only found in the
historian's mind; that is, it cannot be found in the facts or
evidence of past events. Philosopher Karl Popper writes, "There can
be no history of the past as it actually did happen; there can only
be historical interpretations; and none of them final; and every
generation has a right to frame its own."
Dr. Habermas points out some weaknesses of this position. First,
just because one holds personal prejudices and preferences it does
not follow that objective standards cannot be established. Do we
nullify a doctor's diagnosis of an illness because of his feelings
towards his patient? Second, the claim that all historical
knowledge is relative is self contradictory. By merely making this
claim about history one is assuming that at least one claim about
history is somehow true. Could there not be others? Third, many
historians write as if historical relativism is true, but then ask
us to take their works of historical interpretation seriously.
Charles Beard's writings on the founding of our constitutional
system ask us to accept many of his conclusions about what really
happened as true, yet he has been an advocate of historical
relativism. Fourth, prejudice can be recognized and handled. Thomas
Nagel writes, "The very fact that biased thinking can be detected
and its sources investigated shows that objective explanations in
history is not necessarily hopeless." Finally, the study of history
employs normal inductive measures that render knowable conclusions.
Evidence can be offered, debated, and interpreted for historical
events just as it is in the search for scientific knowledge.
Although much work needs to be done in the area of linking
apologetics and the work of historians, there is good reason to
believe that the effort is worth making.
Defending the Faith Scientifically
Dr. Charles Thaxton, Charles University, Prague, The Czech
Republic Summarized by Dr. Ray Bohlin
The Swiss cheese theory of knowledge goes something like this. Most
scientists today have a very good knowledge base of their own
specific area. This includes being very aware of its particular
weaknesses. But most only have a rather popular understanding of
other fields and actually believe that everything there is pretty
solid. So as the scientist pokes his head out of the hole in the
Swiss cheese and scans the horizon, he sees some pretty big holes
in the immediate area, but as he looks beyond his own field, the
holes seem to disappear. Now if he were able to step back from his
private hole in the cheese and actually look at the whole thing, he
would quickly see that the entire block of cheese is riddled with
holes.
Dr. Charles Thaxton, currently teaching at Charles University in
Prague, told his audience at the recent meeting of the Evangelical
Theology Society that more and more scientists are beginning to
step back from their own private hole in the Swiss cheese of
naturalistic materialism and are stepping back to see that the
entire thing is riddled with holes.
The first hole to appear was that the universe was not infinite.
The Big Bang theory has left in ruins the idea of a self-
perpetuating universe. Something or Someone has caused our
existence. Then even within the context of the Big Bang,
mathematicians determined that there is still not enough time for
the universe to produce life. Then with the invention of the
electron microscope we began to see that the cell was not just a
blob of protoplasm, but a highly complex machine operating at a
speed and level of complexity that far outstrips our most complex
computers. On top of that the time period to produce the first life
suddenly was reduced from a billion years in the early earth to
less than 100 million years. The ability to form even the simplest
building blocks of life became nearly impossible to achieve in the
early earth. If you are a reader of TIME magazine, you saw in a
recent issue that the earliest complex life appeared in what has
been known as the Cambrian explosion. This period was first thought
to encompass 75 then 30 and now less than 10 million years.
Scientists are becoming very uncomfortable because they simply
cannot see how natural processes can accomplish all this. Not only
is the Swiss cheese full of holes, but the holes keep getting
bigger.
The biggest hole Dr. Thaxton described involved biology and the DNA
molecule. We have stressed this point many times at Probe. If you
recall, it goes something like this: DNA contains the information
in each living cell for its formation and all of its processes.
Primarily this is accomplished by the fact that the sequence of
nucleotides in segments of DNA called genes, code for the sequence
of amino acids in proteins. The function of the protein is
dependent on the sequence of amino acids and hence on the sequence
in DNA. The genetic code is therefore an informational code.
Information theory and communication theory are united in
proclaiming that informational codes only arise from an intelligent
source. Naturalistic materialism cannot accomplish that.
In a conversation with me after his lecture, Dr. Thaxton indicated
that he first of all wanted to communicate that science is not the
enemy. If something is true, science will support it. And second,
that the evidence concerning DNA is available to almost anyone. It
is solid persuasive evidence that will cause any open inquisitive
mind to stop and consider the implications. With many skeptics
today, that small window is enough for the truth of the gospel to
get through.
Defending the Faith Theologically
Dr. Thomas C. Oden, Drew University Theological School
Summarized by Jerry Solomon
The Christian church has been sharing and defending God's truth for
almost two millennia. During those two thousand years there have
been many challenges to the faith. As we enter a new millennium it
is still necessary to give serious consideration to how we can best
defend the gospel with our theology intact. Dr. Thomas Oden,
professor of theology at Drew University, recently addressed the
annual meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society by answering
seven questions pertaining to how the faith can be defended
theologically.
1. Is the willingness to suffer for truth intrinsic to the
Christian understanding of the truth? Dr. Oden answers by stating
that "No Christian teacher is worth listening to who is not
willing to suffer if need be for the truth that is being taught."
Thus if we are going to stand for the truth in the face of
opposition, we must realize that it may include persecution, even
physical persecution. This sobering truth is found throughout the
New Testament. Its application continues today.
2. How is the concept of the "non-Christian" world best understood
evangelically? "It can only point to a world which lives in
despair," not realizing that the redeeming love of the Incarnate
living God has been revealed. But as we live in the midst of such
despair, we should be cautious to not take the world's fallenness
more seriously than the world's redemption through Jesus Christ.
3. What is happening in the confessing evangelical movements within
the North American mainline? The answer to this question can give
us hope. The mainline denominations, which have progressively
abandoned historic orthodoxy over the past thirty years, have
begun to experience the movement of the Holy Spirit. The faithful
remnant within these denominations are gaining momentum which can
effect needed changes. Thus we should observe these movements and
learn what God is doing as opposed to spending all our energies
voicing "moral outrage and repeating negative grievances."
4. Is the history of exegesis recoverable after a century of
reductionist historicism? Dr. Oden states that "the Holy Spirit
has a history. When this history is systematically forgotten, it
is incumbent upon evangelical guardianship to recover it by new
rigorous historical effort." The wisdom of the past has been
dormant much too long. It must be recovered. We need not continue
to suffer from amnesia.
5. At what point will we learn to kick the post out of
ultramodernity? Perhaps you have heard the term
postmodernism. Dr. Oden makes a distinction between this word and
ultramodernity by asserting that postmodern describes the orthodox
person who has gone through the nightmare of modernity only to
awaken in the "central tradition of classical Christianity."
Ultramodernity best describes the ravings of the "academic avant
garde." "The period after modernity is a required course for
evangelicals who attest the risen Lord amid a dying culture."
6. Where is the Holy Spirit leading evangelical apologetics? After
suffering through the demise of Western thought, the Christian
community is now being led back to a study of the word of God made
known in history.
7. Will the church endure? Dr. Oden believes that even though the
church has always struggled with apostasy and always will, "the
church as body of Christ will be preserved till the end of time."
These seven questions and Dr. Oden's answers certainly provide food
for thought. The apologetic task is great and sometimes
threatening. But God is still at work among His people.
ETS Meetings Summary: A Call to Action
by Dr. Ray Bohlin
This essay has provided you with an overview of the recent annual
meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society. The theme of the
meeting was defending the faith. The four keynote addresses
centered around the main areas in which Christianity finds itself
under attack today, philosophically, historically, scientifically,
and theologically. The fact that the ETS would devote an entire
meeting to this topic indicated the seriousness of the threat.
Historically, more than ever before, modern scholars are attempting
to redefine Jesus. The well-publicized Jesus Seminar not only
denies the physical resurrection of Jesus but is now spending its
time making claims about which of those red-letter sayings in the
gospel accounts in your Bible were actually uttered by Jesus. It
seems that they would rather have Jesus provide a model of a
twentieth-century social activist who sought to empower the masses.
They regard the real historical Jesus as a fable from more
unenlightened times. It is heartening to know, however, that
Christian scholars are rising to the occasion and responding with
devastating clarity to these challenges.
Science and faith have historically fought on a rather bloody
battleground. While the lines are as sharply drawn as ever, the
powerful edifice of scientific materialism is rapidly crumbling.
Philosophers and scientists alike are finding more and more holes
that simply cannot be closed. The concept of intelligent design is
powerful and pervasive as an interpretation of the natural world.
For the first time in over 100 years theologians are seeing science
as more of an ally than an enemy.
Theologically, the liberalism of mainline denominations has led to
the inevitable abandonment of many of the historic truths. This in
turn has loosened the moral underpinnings of the culture. Crime,
divorce, rebellion, suicide, sexual freedom, and a host of other
societal ills have affected or touched us all. The result is a
nation crying for relief, searching for an answer. People are
trying gurus, mediums, self-help groups, pagan rituals, and the
ever-present dollar for satisfaction. They have questions and few
are answering. While the gospel is clearly the answer, we have
become a church unable to think, unable to answer the most basic
questions.
Philosophically then, we must educate ourselves and make sure our
children are properly educated. We must raise up a generation of
thinkers that can answer the questions of the atheist, the New Age
pantheist, the Marxist, and the Islamic fundamentalist. Logic,
defense, and argument all have a place in the Christian's arsenal
to always be ready to make a defense. Our homes, schools, and
churches must not only be places where people of faith meet but
also places where people know how to think. We must both out-think
and out-love the surrounding culture to make an impact.
Probe Ministries exists for that very purpose. Probe is a group of
Christian scholars which promotes a Christian world view by
analyzing and challenging contemporary culture and presenting
balanced, reasoned, biblically-based information. Check out our
World Wide Web page at http://www.probe.org. Our library can
also be found on CompuServe. Just type GO CIN then go to Ministry
Center I. Schedule a Mind Games Conference for your church or city
so that we can train your young people and adults to understand,
defend, and live out a Christian world view. Let us help you to
reach the twenty-first century for Christ.
© 1996 Probe Ministries International
About the Authors
Raymond G. Bohlin is executive director of Probe Ministries.
He is a graduate of the University of Illinois (B.S., zoology),
North Texas State University (M.S., population genetics), and the
University of Texas at Dallas (M.S., Ph.D., molecular biology). He
is the co-author of the book The Natural Limits to Biological
Change, served as general editor of Creation, Evolution and Modern
Science, and has published numerous journal articles. Dr. Bohlin
was named a 1997-98 and 2000 Research Fellow of the Discovery
Institute's Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture. He can
be reached via e-mail at rbohlin@probe.org.
Don Closson received the B.S. in education from Southern Illinois
University, the M.S. in educational administration from Illinois State
University, and the M.A. in Biblical Studies from Dallas Theological Seminary.
He served as a public school teacher and administrator before
joining Probe Ministries as a research associate in the field of education. He is the
general editor of Kids, Classrooms, and Contemporary Education.
He can be reached via e-mail at
dclosson@probe.org.
Rich Milne is a former research associate with Probe Ministries.
He has a B.A. from the University of California, Berkeley, and a Th.M.
from Dallas Theological Seminary. Rich works in the area of the
philosophy and history of science, focusing in particular on the
origin of the universe and the origin of life, and the history and
philosophy of art. He and his wife, Becky, are currently on staff with
East-West Ministries in Dallas, Texas. He can be reached via e-mail at
rmilne@eastwestministries.org.
Jerry Solomon, former Director of Field Ministries and Mind Games
Coordinator for Probe Ministries, served as Associate
Pastor at Dallas Bible Church after leaving Probe. He received the B.A. (summa cum
laude) in Bible and the M.A. (cum laude) in history and theology
from Criswell College. He also attended the University of North
Texas, Canal Zone College, and Lebanon Valley College. Just before Christmas 2000,
Jerry went home to be with the Lord he loved and served.
What is Probe?
Probe Ministries is a non-profit corporation whose mission is to reclaim the
primacy of Christian thought and values in Western culture through media,
education, and literature. In seeking to accomplish this mission, Probe provides
perspective on the integration of the academic disciplines and historic
Christianity.
In addition, Probe acts as a clearing house, communicating the results of
its research to the church and society at large.
Further information about Probe's materials and ministry may be obtained by
writing to:
Probe Ministries
1900 Firman Drive, Suite 100
Richardson, TX 75081
(972) 480-0240 FAX (972) 644-9664
info@probe.org
www.probe.org
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 Probe Ministries
Email this to a friend
copyright
© 1995-2008
Leadership U. All rights reserved.
Updated: 14 July 2002
|