|
|
  
Probe Ministries
Euthanasia: The Battle for Life
Physician-Assisted Suicide
Dr. Raymond G. Bohlin
Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States
On March 6, 1996, the Ninth U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals struck
down Washington state's ban on physician-assisted suicide. By a
surprisingly commanding 8-3 vote, the court ruled that terminally-
ill adults have a constitutional right to end their lives.
Essentially, the court decided that an individual's right to
determine the time and manner of his own death outweighed the
state's duty to preserve life. This ruling will also likely uphold
Oregon's voter approved doctor-assisted suicide law that has been
bogged down in the courts.
The only recourse now is the Supreme Court, which is not expected
to overrule the Appeals Court's decisions. On April 2, the Second
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that New York state's bans on
assisted-suicide were "discriminatory." Then on May 15, 1996, Dr.
Jack Kevorkian, the infamous "Dr. Death," was acquitted for a third
time of doctor-assisted suicide in the state of Michigan.
The stage is set for a revolution in the law concerning euthanasia
in this country. Kevorkian's escapes from the law and these recent
rulings from the Appeals Courts will further encourage the "right-
to-die" lobby which seeks to make doctor-assisted suicide the law
of the land. What will be overlooked is over 2,000 years of medical
practice and ethical codes. The Hippocratic Oath, originating in
400 B.C., and the standard for medical practice ever since, states,
"I will keep [the sick] from harm and injustice. I will neither
give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a
suggestion to that effect."
Allowing doctors to end life as well as preserve life would change
the face of the entire medical community.The doctor/patient
relationship will be forever compromised. Is your doctor's advice
truly in your best interests or in his best interest to rid the
hospital and himself of a pesky patient and situation?
Dr. Thomas Beam, chairman of the Medical Ethics Commission of the
Christian Medical and Dental Society points out, "While the act of
physician-assisted suicide seems compassionate on the surface, it
is often the abandonment of the patient in their most needy time.
Instead of support, the patient may only find confirmation of the
hopelessness of their condition and physician-assisted suicide is
legitimized as the only 'way.'"(1) It is not terribly difficult to
see how this circumstance would undermine the delicate relationship
between a doctor and his patient.
Surely, you say, most people don't agree with the policy of doctor-
assisted suicide. However, the New England Journal of
Medicine reported a poll from the state of Michigan which
indicated that "66 percent of state residents and 56 percent of
Michigan doctors would prefer that doctor-assisted suicide be
legalized not outlawed."(2) And even though doctor-assisted laws
were defeated in referendums in California and Washington, the
defeats were narrow. And a similar law was finally passed in Oregon
in 1994. In addition, 23 states are now considering such
legislation. And as mentioned earlier, two different Appeals Courts
have ruled in favor of doctor-assisted laws. In this essay I will
examine why so many favor legalization of assisted suicide. I will
take a close look at Dr. Jack Kevorkian, the most visible proponent
of assisted suicide. Also, I will examine what the Bible has to say
about life, death, and God's sovereignty. Finally, I will discuss
some test cases and inform you about what you can do to combat this
growing evil in our land.
Who is Dr. Jack Kevorkian and Why Do People Seek His Help?
Why is such a large segment of our society, over 60% in some
communities, enamored with the possibility of physician-assisted
suicide? While there can be many roads that will lead to this
conclusion, the primary one is fear. People today fear being at the
mercy of technology, of being kept alive with no hope of recovery
by machines. Few seem to realize that it is already legal for a
terminally ill patient to refuse life-prolonging measures. We must
realize that there is a difference between simply allowing nature
to take its course when someone is clearly dying and taking direct
measures to hasten someone's death. Former Surgeon General C.
Everett Koop acknowledges,
If someone is dying and there is no doubt about that,
and you believe as I do that there is a difference between giving
a person all the life to which he is entitled as opposed to
prolonging the act of dying, then you might come to a time when you
say this person can take certain amounts of fluid by mouth and
we're not going to continue this intravenous solution because he is
on the way out.(3)
Extraordinary measures are not required to keep a dying person
alive at all costs. But some people fear exactly that. Removing
this fear will take a lot of the wind out of the euthanasia sails.
Secondly, people fear the pain of the dying process. Intractable
pain is a real fear, but few people today realize that most of the
pain of terminally ill patients can be dealt with. Many doctors,
particularly in the U.S., are not aware of all the measures at
their disposal. There are new ways of administering morphine, for
example, that can achieve effective pain management with lower
doses and therefore a lower risk of respiratory complications.
Dr. Paul Cundiff, practicing oncologist and hospice care physician
with 18 years of experience treating dying patients says,
It is a disgrace that the majority of our health care
providers lack the knowledge and the skills to treat pain and other
symptoms of terminal disease properly. The absence of palliative
caretraining for medical professionals results in sub-optimal care
for almost all terminally ill patients and elicits the wish to
hasten their own deaths in a few.(4)
But many would even be willing to live with the pain if they knew
that they would not be left alone. The growth in the hospice
movement will help alleviate this fear as well. The staff at a
hospice is trained to deal not only with physical pain, but with
psychological, social, and spiritual pain as well. If you have seen
pictures of the many people Jack Kevorkian has assisted to commit
suicide, you cannot help but notice that these are lonely,
miserable people. Pain has had little to do with their desire to
commit suicide. As a nation we have in large part abandoned our
elderly population. When God commanded Israel to honor their
fathers and their mothers, this was understood to mean primarily in
their older years. Extended families no longer live together even
when the medical needs of parents are not severe or terribly
limiting. No one wants to be a burden or to be burdened.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian is a retired pathologist with essentially no
training in patient care. He is simply on a personal mission to
bring about legalized physician-assisted suicide to help usher in
a code of ethics based totally on relativism. "Ethics must change
as the situation changes," he says. "That's the way to keep
control. Not by an inflexible maxim that applies for two thousand
years, but an ethical code that will change a decade later."(5)
Right now Kevorkian's victims are the few lonely and desperate
individuals who seek him out. The future victims of his crusade
will not only be those who wish to die, but those whom doctors and
relatives feel should die.
The Lessons of Holland
One of the primary reasons for concern about the legalization of
physician-assisted suicide is the now runaway death culture of
Holland. Doctor-assisted suicide was essentially legalized in
Holland in 1973 by two court decisions. While not officially
legalizing euthanasia in Holland, the courts simply said that if
you follow certain guidelines you will not be prosecuted.
The problem is that any such regulations are not enforceable. As a
result, the government of Netherlands reported in 1991 that only
41% of the doctors obey the rules and 27% admitted to performing
involuntary euthanasia. That is, without the patient's consent! In
addition,over 2% of the deaths in Holland in 1990 were the result
of direct voluntary euthanasia, but 6% of all deaths were the
result of involuntary euthanasia.
Many people in Holland today carry around a card that states they
are not to be euthanized without their consent! That is precisely
where we are headed. Once a right to physician-assisted suicide is
established as it was in Holland, it soon degenerates into others
being willing and able to make the decision for you.(6)
In Holland, doctors performed involuntary killing because they
thought the family had suffered too much; some were tired of taking
care of patients, and one was mad at his patient!(7) Even the
conditions of allowed voluntary euthanasia are appalling.Robin
Bernhoft, a U.S. surgeon of the liver and pancreas, relates an
incident where a doctor in Holland told of a 26 year-old ballerina
with arthritis in her toes requesting to be euthanized. Apparently
since she could no longer pursue her career as a dancer, she was
depressed and no longer wished to live. Amazingly, the doctor
complied with her request. His only justification was to say that
"One doesn't enjoy such things, but it was her choice!"(8)
With this in mind, when the discussion of guidelines comes up,
remember that in Holland, guidelines were useless. Enforcement is
near impossible, and families and doctors as well as patients will
succumb to the pressures of pain, depression and inconvenience.
Sadly, pain and depression are treatable. There have been
tremendous advancements in pain management which the American
medical community is only recently being brought up to speed on.
Depression can also be addressed but some patients, families, and
doctors are often too impatient and lacking in genuine compassion
to do the hard work to bring someone out of a depression. It is
easier to offer help in suicide.
The lessons of Holland need to reinforce in our minds the necessity
of making as many people aware of the dangers as possible. Since
our society is now dominated by a world view that prizes individual
autonomy and shuns any mention of Biblical ethics, it can be very
easy, yet ultimately, deadly, to go along with the crowd.
Why Life Is Worth Living: What the Bible Teaches
As we discuss the issue of euthanasia and physician-assisted
suicide, it is critical that we not only understand what is going
on in the world around us but that we also understand what the
Bible clearly teaches about, life, death, pain, suffering, and the
value of each human life.
First, The Bible teaches that we are made in the image of God and
therefore, every human life is sacred (Genesis 1:26). In Psalm
139:13-16 we learn that each of us is fearfully and wonderfully
made. God himself has knit us together in our mother's womb. We
must be very important to Him if He has taken such care to bring us
into existence.
Second, the Bible is very clear that God is sovereign over life,
death and judgement.In Deuteronomy 32:39 The Lord says, "See now
that I myself am He! There is no god besides me, I put to
death and I bring to life, I have wounded and
I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand." Psalm
139:16 says that it is God who has ordained all of our days before
there is even one of them.Paul says essentially the same thing in
Ephesians 1:11.
Third, to assist someone in committing suicide is to commit murder
and this breaks God's unequivocal commandment in Exodus 20:13.
Fourth, God's purposes are beyond our understanding. We often
appeal to God as to why some tragedy has happened to us or someone
we know. Yet listen to Job's reply to the Lord in Job 42:1-3:
I know that you can do all things; no plan of yours can
be thwarted. [You asked,] 'Who is this that obscures My counsel
without knowledge?' Surely I spoke of things I did not
understand,things too wonderful for me to know.
We forget that our minds are finite and His is infinite. We cannot
always expect to understand all of what God is about. To think that
we can step in and declare that someone's life is no longer worth
living is simply not our decision to make. Only God knows when it
is time. In Isaiah 55:8-9 the Lord declares, "For my thoughts are
not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways. As the heavens
are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher your ways and my
thoughts higher than your thoughts."
Fifth, our bodies belong to God anyway. Paul reminds us in 1
Corinthians 6:15,19 that we are members of Christ's body and that
we have been bought with a price. Therefore we should glorify God
with our bodies. The only one to receive glory when someone
requests doctor-assisted suicide is not God, not the doctor, not
even the family but the patient for being willing to "nobly" face
the realities of life and "unselfishly" end everyone else's misery.
There is no glory for God in this decision.
Lastly, suffering draws us closer to God. In light of the
euthanasia controversy, listen to Paul's words from 2 Corinthians
1:8:
We were under great pressure, far beyond our ability to
endure, so that we despaired even of life. Indeed, in our hearts we
felt the sentence of death. But this happened that we might not
rely on ourselves but on God, who raises the dead.
Not only does He raise the dead but there is nothing that can
separate us from His love (Romans 8:38). For an inspiring and
thoroughly biblical discussion of the euthanasia issue, read Joni
Earickson Tada's book When is it Right to Die? (Zondervan,
1992). Her testimony and clear thinking is in stark contrast to the
conventional wisdom of the world today. We must do the same.
What Will You Do? What Can You Do?
The Christian Medical and Dental Society has produced an excellent
resource on physician-assisted suicide titled The Battle for
Life.(9) As a part of the package they provide several cases to
test your grasp of the principles involved and to help Christians
be aware of the tough decisions that have to be made. I would like
to share two of those with you and then discuss what you can do now
to combat the "right to die" forces in this country.
Here is test case one:
Your 80 year-old grandmother has been fighting cancer
for some time now and feels the emotional strain. She feels like
she'll become a burden to the family. Her doctor notes that she
seems to have lost her desire to live. Should she be able to have
her doctor give her a prescription expressly designed to kill her?
This is precisely what the courts have legalized in recent months
and precisely what God's word says is wrong. It is wrong because it
would be taking her life into our hands and violating God's
sovereignty. Because physician-assisted suicide goes beyond letting
someone die naturally to actually causing the death, it violates
God's commandment, You shall not murder. There is a clear
distinction between allowing death to take its natural course in
someone who is clearly dying with no hope of a cure, and taking
specific measures to end someone's life. There comes a time when
the body is imminently dying. Bodily functions begin to shut down.
At this point, people should be made as comfortable as possible, be
supported and encouraged by their family and doctors, and allowed
to die. This is death with dignity. Taking a lethal injection or
breathing poisonous carbon monoxide takes life out of God's hands
and into our own.
Test case number two:
Your spouse has an incurable fatal disease, has lost
control of bodily functions and is unable to communicate. Special
treatment and equipment can extend your spouse's life for a few
weeks or even months but will involve much pain and exhaustion.
Would it be morally right for you to not arrange for the treatment?
Many would accept a decision not to arrange for treatment because
that would not be killing but simply allowing death to take its
natural course. Such decisions are not always clear-cut, however,
and a physician and family members must take into account the pros
and cons of intervention versus a faster natural death. Sometimes
we rationalize that we need to keep the patient alive as long as
possible because God may still work a miracle. But just how much
time does God need to work a miracle? If God is going to intervene
He will do so on His time and not ours.
Now that we have a better understanding of the issues, you may be
wondering just what we can do about this threat among us. Three
things:
Pray - Pray that God will turn the hearts of people back to
Himself and back to protecting life. Pray for righteousness and
justice in our legal system, that we enact laws that preserve life,
punish the guilty and protect the innocent.
Speak Out - Present this information to other groups. Talk
with your friends and family and discuss the reasons for protecting
life.Contact your state and federal legislators and tell them to
stand against physician-assisted suicide.
Reach Out - Visit the elderly, care for those who can't care
for themselves, comfort the sick. Consider joining or starting a
church ministry to the elderly, handicapped, or other individuals
with special needs. As Christians we must lead the way with our
hearts and actions and not just our words. If we devote our
energies to providing quality and loving care and effective pain
control, the euthanasia issue will die from a lack of interest.
© 1996 Probe Ministries International
Notes
1. "Why is Life Worth Living: An Overview of Physician-Assisted
Suicide." The Battle for Life: An Educational Resource Kit.
Christian Medical and Dental Society, P.O. Box 5, Bristol TN 37621.
1996.
2. Cited in "Kevorkian going on trial on assisted-suicide charge,"
The New York Times, 12 Feb. 1996, National Report, A8.
3. C. Everett Koop. The Surgeon General on Euthanasia.
Presbyterian Journal. Sept. 25, 1985:8.
4. David Cundiff. 1992. Quoted in review of Euthanasia is NOT
the Answer: A Hospice Physician's View by Debbie Decker.
CURRENTS in Science, Technology, and Society. 1(2):20.
5. Jack Kevorkian. 1990. Quoted in "Kevorkian: A Glimpse into the
Future of Euthanasia?" by Sarah Sullivan. Christian Research
Journal 18(4)23-27, 1996.
6. R. Finigsen. 1991. "The Report of the Dutch Committee on
Euthanasia." Issues in Law and Medicine 7:339-44.
P.J. van der Maas. 1991. "Euthanasia and Other Medical Decisions
Concerning the End of Life." Lancet 338:669-74.
7. "California's Proposition 161 and Euthanasia." 1992. CURRENTS
in Science, Technology, and Society 1(2):11. Published by
Access Research Network, P.O. Box 38069, Colorado Springs, CO
80937-8069.
8. Robin Bernhoft, M.D. 1995. Quoted in Euthanasia: False
Light. Produced by IAETF, P.O. Box 760, Steubenville, OH 43952.
Running time: 14:48.
9. The Battle for Life is an educational resource kit
produced by the Christian Medical and Dental Society. The Kit
includes an award winning video, Euthanasia: False Light, a
leader's presentation guide with discussion questions, handouts for
Christian and secular audiences, overhead transparencies, Biblical
principles summary, research synopsis, cassette tape of public
service announcements, and bulletin inserts. The Kit is available
from the Christian Medical and Dental Society, P.O. Box 5, Bristol,
TN 37621, Phone (615) 844-1000, FAX: (615) 844-1005. The retail
price for the complete kit is $30. The Kit can also be purchased
through Probe Ministries.
About the Author
Raymond G. Bohlin is executive director of Probe Ministries.
He is a graduate of the University of Illinois (B.S., zoology),
North Texas State University (M.S., population genetics), and the
University of Texas at Dallas (M.S., Ph.D., molecular biology). He
is the co-author of the book The Natural Limits to Biological
Change, served as general editor of Creation, Evolution and Modern
Science, and has published numerous journal articles. Dr. Bohlin
was named a 1997-98 and 2000 Research Fellow of the Discovery
Institute's Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture. He can
be reached via e-mail at rbohlin@probe.org.
What is Probe?
Probe Ministries is a non-profit corporation whose mission is to reclaim the
primacy of Christian thought and values in Western culture through media,
education, and literature. In seeking to accomplish this mission, Probe provides
perspective on the integration of the academic disciplines and historic
Christianity.
In addition, Probe acts as a clearing house, communicating the results of
its research to the church and society at large.
Further information about Probe's materials and ministry may be obtained by
writing to:
Probe Ministries
1900 Firman Drive, Suite 100
Richardson, TX 75081
(972) 480-0240 FAX (972) 644-9664
info@probe.org
www.probe.org
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 Probe Ministries
Email this to a friend
copyright
© 1995-2008
Leadership U. All rights reserved.
Updated: 14 July 2002
|